By browsing our site you accept the installation and use cookies on your computer. Know more

Menu Logo Principal UMR ISPA Institute of Agricultural Sciences

Home page

BIONUT Group

Nutrient biogeochemistry

BIONUT GROUP :

 

 

Context of the research

The issue of the "Biogeochemistry of Nutrients" (BIONUT) team is to answer the question of how to sustainably manage nutrients (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus) to ensure agricultural and forest production while limiting environmental impacts. The team studies a variety of ecosystems ranging from field crops and cultivated grasslands to forests. The ecosystems studied are located in the Aquitaine region and throughout France. The team also has numerous collaborations on study sites around the world (Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Madagascar, New Zealand, Morocco, Siberia, Switzerland...).

img_bionut1

Objectives

The main objective of the BIONUT team is to improve our understanding of ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycles through:

- (i) quantification of nutrient stocks and flows at different scales (plot, field, territory, world)

- (ii) mechanistic modelling of physico-chemical and biological processes.

Ultimately, it is about producing scientific knowledge, advice and good practice for managers of agricultural and forest ecosystems.

img_bionut2

Themes

The team's three main themes are:

  • Study and modelling of soil-plant relationships and soil functioning in response to nutrient bioavailability within terrestrial ecosystems. The team is studying the role of agricultural practices, biodiversity and climate change on the productivity and ecosystem services provided by terrestrial ecosystems.
  • Study and modelling of the long-term functioning of biogeochemical cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. In particular, the team is studying how the coupling between nutrient and carbon cycles from small scales (microorganisms, roots) to much larger scales (regional, global).
  • Modelling of phosphorus flows at encompassing scales. The team is studying here the determinants of phosphorus resource use and their impact on soil bioavailability on a global scale.
img_bionut3

Approach and Tools

One of the main characteristics of the team is to approach the biogeochemistry of nutrients from small to large scales by combining both experimentation and modelling.

The processes we are studying relate to soil functioning (transfer processes at the soil-solution interface; nutrient bioavailability, microbial and mycorrhizae communities), plant functioning (mineral harvesting by the root system, assimilation and allocation of carbon and mineral elements between organs, symbiotic nitrogen fixation) and the impact of management practices (agronomy and silviculture).

The main tools used are:

  • Experimentation under controlled conditions on soil samples or potted crops to study nutrient bioavailability, soil function or plant sampling and growth.
  • In situ field experimentation to evaluate our models, identify species/forms of P (speciation) and quantify compartments and flows in the biogeochemical cycle.
  • Mechanistic (or sometimes statistical) modeling as a conceptual framework to organize and formalize our research to produce numerical models. These are used for prediction, to develop and test scenarios, to quantify and prioritize the relative weight of modelled processes according to the contexts and scales considered, to produce or feed decision support tools.
  • Analysis and use of statistical databases; bibliographic or survey-based to understand flows at inclusive scales, assess recycling opportunities.
img_bionut4bis
img_bionut4

 

           

Publications

Some important publications

Nadeem M, Mollier A, Morel C, Shahid M, Aslam M, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Wahid MA, Pellerin S. 2013. Maize seedling phosphorus nutrition: Allocation of remobilized seed phosphorus reserves and external phosphorus uptake to seedling roots and shoots during early growth stages. Plant and Soil 371: 327–338.

Gonzalez M, Augusto L, Gallet-Budynek A, Xue J, Yauschew-Raguenes N, Guyon D, Trichet P, Delerue F, Niollet S, Andreasson F, et al. 2013. Contribution of understory species to total ecosystem aboveground and belowground biomass in temperate Pinus pinaster Ait. forests. Forest Ecology and Management 289: 38–47.

Morel C, Ziadi N, Messiga A, Bélanger G, Denoroy P, Jeangros B, Jouany C, Fardeau J-C, Mollier A, Parent L-E, et al. 2014. Modeling of phosphorus dynamics in contrasting agroecosystems using long-term field experiments. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 94: 377–387.

Brédoire F, Bakker MR, Augusto L, Barsukov PA, Derrien D, Nikitich P, Rusalimova O, Zeller B, Achat DL. 2016. What is the P value of Siberian soils? Soil phosphorus status in south-western Siberia and comparison with a global data set. Biogeosciences 13: 2493–2509.

Regan JT, Marton S, Barrantes O, Ruane E, Hanegraaf M, Berland J, Korevaar H, Pellerin S, Nesme T. 2017. Does the recoupling of dairy and crop production via cooperation between farms generate environmental benefits? A case-study approach in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 82, Part B: 342–356.